Estimating Fitness Levels: FFMI Method

I recently discovered the Fat Free Mass Index a couple of days ago. I actually have to thank the YouTube Algorithm for suggesting another video series by Vitruvian Physique on distinguishing whether or not someone is "natty" or not. I did a good bit of research investigating it and found that these 4 articles summarize the pro-cons of the method the best IMO:

If you want to see the academic article that spurned this whole operation here's the link. Anyways, here's the formula:

\begin{align*} \rm
FFMI & = \dfrac{ FFM_{kg} }{ (Height_m)^2 } \\& \\& =
\left[ \dfrac{ 0.45359237 }{ (0.0254)^2 } \right]
\dfrac{ FFM_{lb} }{ (Height_{in})^2 } \\& \\& \approx
703.07\left[ \dfrac{ FFM_{lb} }{ (Height_{in})^2 } \right]

\rm{ Normalization \: Correction} & =
6.3(1.8- \rm{H_m}) \\& \\& \approx
0.16(70.87 - \rm{H_{in}})

\rm{ Height \: Normalized \: FFMI = FFMI - Normalization \:Correction}

If you want to get some perspective on what the values mean I suggest watching these videos. Specifically the third one as he graphically depicts his views (occurs right after 5:00).

Online FFMI Calculator:

Maximum FFM

The study clearly indicates 25 as being the maximal index. I went ahead and did some math to figure that equation out. As you can see from:*W*(H%5E(-2))-(6.3)(0.0254)(1.8%2F0.0254+-H),+solve+for+W

the equation stands at:

W_{lb} & = (H_{in})^2 (0.0516876 - 0.000227602 (H_{in})) \\& \\& \approx (H_{in})^2 (0.0517 - 0.00023(H_{in}))

Therefore the maximum weight as predicted by the FFMI at a specific BF% is found via:

W_t & =\dfrac{W_{lb}}{1-0.01(\rm{Body \: Fat \: Percentage})} \\& \\& \approx
\dfrac{(H_{in})^2 (0.0517 - 0.00023(H_{in}))}{1-0.01(\rm{Body \: Fat \: Percentage})}

You can compare this to another estimate I modeled off of
Martin Berkhan found below. In general, from quick comparison the FFMI method gives a higher maximum result.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.